Abstract

Research Article

Comparative anatomy of selected bones of forelimb of local Mongrelian Dog (Canis lupus familiaris) in Sokoto, Nigeria

Bello A* and Wamakko HH

Published: 14 December, 2021 | Volume 5 - Issue 1 | Pages: 026-031

This research was conducted over period of 3 months with the aim of studying Age related changes of selected bones of forelimb (Scapula, Humerus, Radius and Ulna) in Local Mongrelian Dog (Canis lupus familiaris). The study entails biometrical and gross observations on the bones. The sample bones were acquired from the experimental animals of comparative anatomy in the department. The bones were categorized into various age groups for the research. The length, width, diameter and circumference of the samples (scapula, humerus, radius and ulna bones) were determined for all the groups. The shape, size, color, location, position and relation of each segment of the samples at various stages of development were determined. The differences across the age groups of different samples were observed and recorded. Based on the research result, it was concluded that, the biometric and morphometry data was found to be increasing with advancement of age. A baseline data was established with the view to enhance learning.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.ivs.1001033 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

Age related changes; Mongrelian dog; Scapula; Humerus; Radius and Ulna

References

  1. Xiaoming W, Mauricio A, Richard T, Dogs: Their Fossil Relatives and Evolutionary History. New York: Columbia University Press. 2008; 1.
  2. Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis & haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature. 2005; 438: 803–819.
  3. Young Julie K, Olson Kirk A, Reading Richard P, Sukh A, Joel B, et al. 2011.
  4. Fan Z, Silva P, Gronau I, Wang S, Armero AS, et al. Worldwide patterns of genomic variation and admixture in gray wolves. Genome Res. 2016; 26: 163–173. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26680994/
  5. Thalmann O, Shapiro B, Cui P, Schuenemann VJ, Sawyer SK, et al. Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Ancient Canids Suggest a European Origin of Domestic Dogs. Science. 2013; 342: 871–874. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24233726/
  6. Vila C. Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science. 1997; 276: 1687–1689. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9180076/
  7. Freedman AH, Gronau I, Schweizer RM, Del Vecchyo DO, Han E, et al. Genome Sequencing Highlights Genes Under Selection and the Dynamic Early History of Dogs. PLOS Genetics. 2014; 10: e1004016. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24453982/
  8. Vonholdt BM, Driscoll CA. 3-Origins of the dog: Genetic insights into dog domestication. In James Serpell (ed.) 2016.
  9. Larson G, Bradley DG. Perri Angela. A wolf in dog's clothing: Initial dog domestication and Pleistocene wolf variation. J Archaeological Sci. 2016; 68: 1–4.
  10. Perri A. A wolf in dog's clothing: Initial dog domestication and Pleistocene wolf variation. J Archaeological Sci. 68: 1–4.
  11. Dewey T, Bhagat s. Canis lupus familiaris, Animal Diversity Web. 2002.
  12. Berns GS, Brooks AM, Neuhauss SM, Stephan CF. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Unrestrained Dogs. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e38027. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22606363/
  13. Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt ML, Maqbool K, Webster MT, et al. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature. 2013; 495: 360–364. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23354050/
  14. Nikhil S. Why are different breeds of dogs all considered the same species? – Scientific AmericanArchived 10 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine. 2016.
  15. Freedman AH, Wayne RK. Deciphering the Origin of Dogs: From Fossils to Genomes. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2017; 5: 281–307. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27912242/
  16. Larson G, Bradley DG. How Much Is That in Dog Years? The Advent of Canine Population Genomics. PLOS Genetics. 2014; 10: e1004093.
  17. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy, 3rd W.B sounders. 2002.
  18. National Population Commission (NPC), Census Data of 2006.
  19. Statistical Analysis System (SAS) package version 9.2 software (Statistical Analysis System, 2007, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
  20. Siddiqui MSI, Khan MZI, Sarma M, Islam MN, Jahan MR. Macro-anatomy of the bones of the limb of Black Bengal Goat (Capra hircus). Bangladesh J Veterin Med. 2008; 6: 59-66.
  21. Choudhary OP, Singh I. Morphometrical studies on Scapula of Indian Blackbuck (Antelope cervicapra). Indian Veterin J. 2016; 93: 64-67.
  22. Choudhary OP, Mathur R, Joshi S, Beniwal G, Dangi A. Gross and biometrical studies on scapula of chital (Axis axis). Veterinary Practitioner. 2013; 14: 036- 039.
  23. Dalvi RS, Bhamburkar VR, Ladukar ON, Banubakode SB. Morphometric study on scapulae of some domestic and wild animals. Tech. Bul. XII Convention and National Symposium of IAVA. 1997; 43.
  24. Jangir DK. Thesis entitled “Gross studies on the bones of the Forelimb in Indian Gazelle (Gazella gazelle bennettii)” College of veterinary and animal sciences, RAJUVAS, Bikaner. 78-91.

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1

Figure 3

Figure 1

Figure 4

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More